Do You Want to be a Revolutionary?

Do you want to be a Revolutionary?

All you really have to do is decide in your heart of hearts, at the deep down center of your soul that THE government is not YOUR government.

You don’t have to take up arms, or blow up buildings, or go to jail. You don’t even have to protest. You just have to conclude in your brain and decide with your will that “it” is not an “us” or “we.”

It’s a little bit like traveling. Everywhere I go in the world, there is always a government to deal with or put up with. They are always collecting taxes and fees and passing rules and regulations. I pay the taxes and fees when I have to and follow the rule or regulation if it seems sensible or just. That doesn’t mean I recognize the validity of or somehow identify with the ruling regime of the country I’m traveling in. It simply means I am adapting to the environment I happen to be in.

The same principle applies for living inside the USA and deciding to become a revolutionary. You have to deal with the government. It is sometimes convenient to follow their rules and put up with their shit. But not all the time. You can pick your battles. The important thing is the underlying relationship between you and the government. Is it your government or the government. Is it somehow a manifestation of you and your beliefs or is it an adversary that interferes with your life?

That is what the election game is all about. It’s a corporate marketing blitz to convince taxpayers that they are involved in the governmental process. If you believe it is real. If you believe that voting in Presidential elections matters, then you are not a revolutionary.

So now the election is over and the bad guy has won. The corporate media is now using the power of propaganda to focus everyone’s revolutionary energy on the bad guy at the face of the system. If you are protesting the newly “elected” President rather than the system that put him in place, then you are not a revolutionary. You are a pawn in a reality television marketing campaign.

A certain popular progressive politician recently ran a rather successful Presidential primary campaign that he marketed as a “revolution.” He didn’t win the nomination but he has now formed an organization to collect money to finance other Progressive candidates to run for different positions in the government. Calling such a strategy or plan a “revolution” is a bit ridiculous. Actually, it’s the opposite of a revolution.

It does not matter how many good progressives are pulling and yanking on the levers of the broken system. The system needs to be replaced not just managed by better, nicer and more competent people. Indeed, collecting money to convince more good people to continue working within the obviously broken system undermines the possibility for real fundamental change.

The political/economic system as presently designed requires continuous war and ever increasing energy consumption in order to thrive. If that system continues, the ecosystem is doomed.

Divest from war.
Divest from fossil fuels.
Divest from Empire!
Invest in your community instead.

We must design and implement a new system and stop participating in the one that does not work. That’s revolution.

How?

Start local.
This essay is not copyrighted. Feel free to share it or copy it or paste it or plagiarize it or send it on to any one and everyone.

The Imaginary Revolution

image

If you can imagine how something is possible there is always a chance that it will happen.  Even if the odds are significantly against it.  So imagine, if you will, a non-violent economic revolution…

How deep do I have to dig in order to explain the concept to the average reader? For me, at least, it is completely comprehensible. It seems so simple. All it has to do is unfold like a lotus flower. Why can’t everyone understand? It is a philosophical revolution. Collapse the old metaphor and replace it with a new one.  The “survival of the fittest”story is way too simplistic and one-sided.  Ecological interdependence is a much more realistic explanation of the observable world.   Down with the linear mechanical system that seeks only to win the competition and up with a dynamic organic system that seeks to live well within a healthy ecosystem.

Every cell is part of a tissue but is also an individual cell. Every tissue is part of a body, but is also an individual tissue. Every body is part of a community but is also an individual body. Every community is part of an ecosystem but is also an individual community. Every ecosystem is part of the whole planet earth but is also an individual ecosystem.

The dynamic relationship between the individual and the community. Therein lies the essence of free will. Therein lies the foundation for an economic system that makes sense. Communism/Socialism is a broken concept because it subordinates the individual instinct to the communal instinct. Capitalism/Corporatism is a broken concept because it subordinates the communal instinct to the individual instinct. Dynamic/Organic economics seeks the middle path between the two.

Capitalism is yang and Socialism is yin.
A healthy economic system is based upon the interdependence of both concepts.

Can you see the light yet?

Sometimes it acts like a particle and sometimes it acts like a wave.

Decentralize the power structures
And
Localize the economic system.

It’s not that complicated. Start with the first principle. A dynamic relationship between the individual and the community. Interdependence. Freequality. That is the foundation… the building block… The organizational structure (government) for a healthy community (state) grows out of that concept.

Dynamic/Organic Economics. (A Manifesto)

The first principle of organic economics is that all humans have an economic right to food, shelter and basic healthcare. Any government that does not guarantee those basic economic rights to all humans living within its jurisdiction is not a legitimate government.

It’s not welfare. It’s not an entitlement or a handout or charity. It’s a right. Everybody gets it. It’s your foundational bargaining position, human dignity, that allows you to participate in the free market.

The religion of capitalism is built completely upon the myth that the working class job seeker has bargaining position. But in reality, the worker does not have bargaining position. That is what the revolution is all about. If you guarantee economic rights you change the nature of the relationship between the employer and employee. The authoritarian hierarchy becomes a dynamic balance.

The theory of organic economics argues that the best way to give workers back their bargaining position/economic freedom is through the “democratization” of currency flows.

Presently, most, if not all, governments on the planet earth use some type of oligarchic linear money supply system. The currency supply is controlled by an elite central government and distributed to the population through a variety of trickle down mechanisms. In the US, they use a mechanism called fractional reserve banking. Private banks who borrow from the Fed are allowed to create money as credit and lend it out to people or institutions. In other words, when new money is added to the system, it is always given to people or institutions who have money in the first place. In other countries, the government or central bank creates the currency and passes it directly to its closest friends and relatives who then pass it down to the general population. Some governments may try to distribute currency in a way that is beneficial to the general population while some governments don’t seem to care about the populace at all. Either way, it is always a downward distribution from government insiders (bankers) to citizens.

In order to transform(revolutionize) the economic system, we must stop adding new money to the system through private banks. Outlaw fractional reserve banking. Private banks can only lend money they actually have. Instead, add new money to the system using the principles of organic economics.

In organic economics, all citizens have equal access to the circular flow of currency. Money is a function of the fair market value of food and shelter and basic healthcare within the jurisdiction that the money is distributed. It’s a mathematical equation with the community and the individual on opposite sides of the dynamic balance. There is no secret cabal of decision makers who get to decide who gets what. Money is automatically distributed according to the principles of the system. Every single person gets the exact same deal. You don’t borrow money from the oligarchy based upon your “credit rating”. You receive your fair democratic share of economic rights within the community/state where you live.

The formula itself is fairly simple. At the beginning of each month, each individual in the community/state is invested with the fair market value of food, shelter and basic healthcare in the currency of the community (how big the community? A small state? Hmm…). In exchange for that monthly investment, each individual agrees to respect the basic property rights (possessions) of other participants in the system and to contribute 50% of everything they earn (in whatever currency) on the free market back to the community/state at the end of each quarter or each year. The important thing is that money flows back and forth between community/state and individual as economic value is continually used and created.

In the confusing language of the punditocracy, you might say that everybody gets welfare (even billionaires)and everybody pays a 50% tax (even billionaires). But in organic economics, welfare is an investment in an individual and not a stigma because everyone gets it and taxes are a return to the community and not a punishment because they are based upon an agreement between people instead of imposed by psychopaths who want to fight more wars.

Do you get it yet? It makes sense. Economic democracy. Dynamic work relationships. Organic economics.

The non-violent economic revolution starts now!

This essay is not copyrighted, please feel free to share it or copy it or paste it or plagiarize it or send it to anyone and everyone.

Thanks, and have a wonderful day.

 

A Little Light in the Election Darkness

image

A Little Light in the Election Darkness

I was wrong. It’s feels good to admit that once in a while. The universe just gave me a dose of humility to help round out my soul. I was all wrong about the election. I thought for sure that Hillary was going to win in a landslide. Of course I did not want Hillary to win. I didn’t want Trump to win either. As most people who know me are aware, I don’t vote in Presidential elections as a matter of principle. Democracy breaks down the greater the number of participants. And I don’t see the point in voting for people rather than policies. In my opinion, it’s a great big charade. It’s a friendly competition between two teams of oligarchs to see who gets to screw over the underclass for the next four years. Since both teams of oligarchs have been steadily applying the same policies for the last thirty years or so, it really makes little difference which party wins. This country needs a non-violent economic revolution, not another ruler to love or hate on the tv screen. Nevertheless, I thought for sure Hillary and the democrats had it in the bag. How in the world did the crazy clown pull it off?

For many years I have been fascinated by the intersection of economics and politics and this year’s Presidential election is an amazing demonstration of my theories on that intersection. I was dead wrong about the result but my underlying analysis was more or less on target. I simply misunderstood one little variable and that screwed up my conclusion.

First, the basics. Aside from the 01% who rule things, and the other 01% who are not even allowed to play (incarcerated or homeless), America has two distinct economic classes. It helps to realize what class you are in because the day to day lived experience of the two classes is dramatically different. Indeed, I would suggest that the two distinct classes have such different day to day realities that they do not understand each other at all.

At this particular time in history, approximately 70% of US citizens live survival check to survival check. Their survival checks come from minimum wage jobs or part time jobs or “free lance” jobs or some minuscule government subsidy or private pension survival ration. They have less than a thousand dollars in savings, very little home equity, no stocks or bonds and very high mortgage payments or rent to keep a roof over their heads. In other words, they are one unfortunate mishap away from seriously desperate circumstances. Their day to day existence is one of anxiety and work and more anxiety and more work. They don’t have the time to research detailed articles on politics or economics because they are too busy trying to make ends meet. No doubt they are exposed to large doses of mass media and they have their favorite source of news and information but politics is not something they focus on. I call this class, “the precariate” because their economic reality is so precarious. The majority of the precariate does not usually vote. And when they do vote it is based mainly on instinct and the superficial background information provided by the mass media. They do not vote based on detailed analysis of economics or policy.

The other 30% of US citizens do not live survival check to survival check. They have decent paying jobs, money in the bank, some home equity, and a few stocks, bonds or investments. Although they too suffer through tragedy, anxiety and stress because they are slaves of the corporate organizational structure, they are not one step away from seriously desperate circumstances. They have some leisure time to read the intellectual magazines and to study detailed analyses of economics and politics. They also have time to attend protests and rallies and to participate in the political process. They don’t necessarily understand politics or economics but they have lots of information and ideas to support their misunderstanding. I call this class, “the prosperiate” because their economic reality is fairly prosperous. The overwhelming majority of the prosperiate do vote. Generally speaking, they vote for one of the two teams of oligarchs (democrats or republicans). Their intellectual magazines and detailed economic and political analyses always convinces them that the two political teams are the only “realistic” options.

Generally speaking, it is the prosperiate who decide elections in the US because they are the ones that vote. They believe they are being good citizens by participating in a governmental process. Some people even get very patriotic and proud about it. But, in reality, their individual votes are statistically irrelevant and their opinions and analyses are ignored by the oligarchs. For the most part, the prosperiate vote is divided equally between the Democrats and Republicans with a little fluidity depending upon circumstances on the ground. The single most important variable that controls the outcome of elections is the day to day economic reality of the prosperiate.

I thought for sure that Hillary and the Democrats were going to win in a landslide this year because the facts on the ground are that Barack Obama and the Democrats have been quite good economically for the prosperiate. The economic world was on shaky ground even for the prosperiate at the end of George Bush’s term. The Republican team had fucked things up so bad that Capitalism itself was on the ropes. As such, Barack Obama had a unique opportunity to transform things. But he didn’t transform things. Instead, he just proved himself to be a remarkably good manager of the capitalist system. His team of bankers and Wall Street insiders got the money flowing again. If you are a member of the prosperiate, then you are probably aware of this economic reality. Life is way better at the end of Barack Obama’s term than it was at the end of George Bush’s. If you combine this truth with the fact that the Republican candidate presented himself as a mysoginistic, racist asshole, it seemed obvious to me that Hillary Clinton and the Democrats would win in a landslide. But I was wrong.

The precariate doesn’t usually decide elections because the precariate don’t usually vote very much. They understand intuitively that the process is bullshit and they can’t be bothered wasting their time. Every once in a while, however, a particularly persuasive orator with the right marketing plan will con the precariate into participation. I will call this, the rock star effect.
Ronnie Reagan was probably a rock star but I was too young to be aware of it. The first rock star candidate that I witnessed was Barack Obama in 2008. Since ethnic minorities make up a high percentage of the non-voting precariate, he had a unique advantage in convincing them to play in the election game. By 2012, of course, the jig was up. The precariate was painfully aware of the fact that Obama and the Democrats were full of shit and they went back to their non-voting well justified cynicism. They did not turn around and vote for Republicans, they just did not vote at all. Obama won in 2012 by winning the votes of the prosperiate.

This is the thing that baffles me. Most but not all of my regular social contacts are members of the prosperiate. They still do not seem to believe that the big con happened because they did not really have to suffer the consequences. Indeed, in some respects, they were secondary, minor beneficiaries of it. The precariate, however, is painfully aware of the consequences even if they don’t understand exactly how it happened. What is the economic truth?

Financial engineering. In the last eight years, the oligarchs engineered the largest transfer of real world wealth upward from the lower classes to the oligarchs in the history of the world. Most of the prosperiate class was lucky enough to get their hands on some of that wealth as it passed its way upward so they are still doing pretty good. But a significant percentage of the prosperiate class fell into the precariate class and the precariate class as a whole got slammed.

I don’t blame Obama personally. He was merely the smiling front man. The brain trust at Goldman Sachs probably came up with the concept. Republicans and democrats were both in on it but it was a democratic administration that implemented it. The primary mechanisms they used to pull this maneuver off included TARP, bank bailouts and quantitative easing. They also did not prosecute bankers for obvious fraud. But this is not the place for a detailed analysis of their little economic magic trick. If you have the time to research politics and economics you can probably figure it out. My point is a simple one. The prosperiate class seems blissfully unaware that the magic trick happened. At most they might mention it as one issue among many. But the precariate class has to live with its consequences in their day to day economic reality… Full time “jobs” are now part time “jobs”. The “jobs” available are minimum wage part time jobs in the service sector. The cost of shelter is going through the roof. The only food that is affordable is chemically laden genetically modified corporate garbage. It now costs money to drink water. Indeed, it now costs money to do anything and money is just not available. In other words, day to day economic reality for the precariate class really really sucks. They may not know how or why the system has fucked them over but they do know that it has.

Which is why I assumed that the precariate would not vote. After all, a vote is an affirmation of the system. A republican is just the same as a democrat. Only a rock star conman could convince the precariate to go out and participate in the election game. Which is why I was wrong about the election. I didn’t think Trump was a rock star conman. I thought he was an absurd clown and obvious conman. I even thought he and Hillary were in on it together. He was there to make the opposition look bad so that Hillary could generate momentum for her more aggressive war in Syria. Apparently, the Trumpster was a much better con man than I gave him credit for. The democrats took the bait and responded to his rather unusual candidacy in the stupidest way ever.

In retrospect, it seems obvious to me that Hillary lost the election the day she referred to Trump’s supporters as “a basket of deplorables”. And it wasn’t just her, it was the entire Democratic campaign. They did not debate, discuss, and intelligently criticize candidate Trump’s various policy proposals, instead they insulted the citizens who were “stupid” enough to vote for him. If you have social media or you watch television you were exposed to the barrage of memes and insults. Fascists, nazis, racists, bigots, crackers, white trash, losers, meth heads, stupid people, morons. They would capture an image of the most absurd example of a Trump supporter doing something stupid and splash it all over the news feed. Half of them were probably actors. It all makes perfect sense to me now. The democrats had a lock on the people who usually vote. Donald Trump was entertaining to people who don’t vote. They probably would have just laughed at Trump’s obnoxious character and stayed home like they usually do until the Democrats started egging them on. When the entire media and political establishment joined in the pile on against Trump, a tidal wave of condescending was directed towards his supporters. Action therefore reaction. The entire establishment was telling them not to vote for this guy. Their attitude is; fuck the establishment. So, of course, they voted for him. In other words, President Trumpster is Karmic Payback to Democrats for pissing on the precariate class.

But alas my dear friends who are Democrats, things are not as bad as it seems on this time of election darkness. This was not a cout de tat. The Donald is not a Dictator. Those scary people you saw on television and in Facebook memes are not taking over the government. Team Republican of the oligarchs just beat out team Democrat in a marketing contest. The well-mannered, smooth talking, ethnic minority figurehead is about to be replaced by a rude, obnoxious, clown figurehead. The oligarchs will move a few seats around and the system and the Empire will continue. If you voted for Hillary, you are probably a member of the prosperiate class. Since team republican generally pursues the same economic policies as team Democrat and those policies sort of benefit the prosperiate, your life will probably continue pretty much the same as it is now. It may even get a little bit better. Hopefully, though, with an obnoxious clown on the nightly news every night, you will be inspired to learn about and criticize the dreadful things your government does to others for the sake of your economic benefit. The massacre in and wholesale destruction of the once prosperous nation state of Libya comes to mind. Not to mention the economic warfare waged against your fellow citizens through the aforementioned magic trick.

So anyway, I am finding myself strangely optimistic in the face of the Trumpster’s presidency. Not because I think he will adopt good policy. There is no such thing as good policy in a capitalist empire. No doubt about it, the clown is going to kick the precariate constituency that put him in office right in the head just like Obama did to his precariate constituency. They will probably have a good laugh about it during their Oval Office meeting. Obummer did it as soon as he named his Goldman Sachs cabinet and I will bet you dollars to donuts that the Trumpster names a bunch of old hands from team republican to run his show as well. After all, it is not as if the clown has a plan to run the government. The Trumpster dumpster full of wacky policy ideas he tossed out during the campaign was not even a coherent ideology. Perhaps he will shut down the TPP and improve relations with Russia. That would be good. But I won’t hold my breath.

I’m optimistic about the Trumpster’s reign because I believe his presence will inspire people to act in opposition to empire. I know the media is trying to spin the election result as some sort of manifestation of racism, misogyny and lurking cultural backwardness. But the media is full of shit with a not so hidden agenda. They are trying to incite a culture/race war in order to fend off an economic revolution that is becoming more and more possible all the time. The election of the Trumpster clown to the highest office was a rejection of the globalized capitalist economic system, it was not the choosing of a race-based mysoginist tyrant. And when the Trumpster clown governs just like other republicans, the precariate who put him in office will reject him too.

That’s right, the times ahead look interesting and entertaining as well. Yeah, I know, my democratic friends who are members of the prosperiate are afraid of real revolution. What can I suggest to appease their fear? Try not to worry too much because it probably won’t happen. There is at least a 30% chance that the BS wing of the Democratic Party will co-opt the revolution with a promise of cookie crumbs for the precariate and Capitalism will continue on it’s merry way until it destroys the planet in a climate meltdown or nuclear conflagration. There is also probably a 30 % chance, the Trumpster and his republican team will save capitalism by providing the precariate with decent jobs in the ever growing “homeland security” and “world conquest” industries. How many serfs does it take to build a wall? In which case, Capitalism will continue on it’s merry way until it destroys the planet in a climate meltdown or nuclear conflagration.

That leaves about a 40% chance for economic revolution. It’s not quite probable but it is possible. I will takes those odds. Way better than years passed. I guess it is also possible that the revolution will be violent but it certainly doesn’t have to be. When the European descendants in the precariate become disillusioned with their clown President, the situation will be ripe. The mass media is trying to ignite a culture war between the two sides of the precariate in order to distract them from focusing on the Oligarchs. Don’t feed the media’s fire. Reach out to the precariate no matter what their race or how “stupid” their superficial politics. Love trumps hate. Try to empathize with the desperation a broken economic system has imposed upon them. They were so desperate, in fact, that they voted for a clown. If the opposite sides of the precariate culture war can unify to fight for their common economic interests, the oligarchs will lose. All they need is a plan or theory or concept to get behind.

Not Capitalism
Not Socialism
Organic economics
Reverse financial engineering
DEMOCRATIZE THE MONEY SUPPLY
Quantitative ease the precariate class!
Viva la Revolution

And have a very wonderful day.

This essay is not copyrighted. Please feel free to share it with anyone and everyone.

Happy Election Day

image

Happy Election Day!

I wasn’t even going to watch the debates because I think the whole Presidential campaign is a “reality television” bullshit performance to distract Americans from their monetary slavery and continuous war economy. But I thought it might be mildly entertaining and sociologically interesting so I tuned in to see. What I witnessed and the reaction to what I witnessed was absolutely insane.

She said it live on national television during the second debate. I heard it myself with my own two ears. She favors imposing a no-fly zone on Syria. Anyone with even a limited understanding of international relations is aware that Russia is presently flying missions in Syria on behalf of the Syrian government. Imposing a no-fly zone in Syria is war with Russia. She proposed WWIII on national television as a “campaign promise” and all anyone could talk about afterwards was the mysoginistic clown who stalked her around the stage.

Actually, the historians will probably put the start date for the slowly unfolding WWlll on 9-11-2001. Or maybe they will back date even further to when the Soviet Union collapsed and all those psychotics in the council on foreign relations concocted their crazy plan to take over the whole world (The Project for a New America Century). When it started doesn’t matter. The reality is that the US is already up to its knees in war (Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Somalia, South Sudan, the Congo and probably several other “theaters”). During the reign of Obama, the expansion of the US military footprint internationally has increased dramatically. More drones, more bases, more weapons, more special forces and more “private security corporations”. In other words, more war because the people who run the economy know that war is very good for business.

Yeah, I know, a campaign promise is only a campaign promise. She doesn’t necessarily have to start an active hot war with Russia just because she says during a debate that she favors such a thing. But the reality is, regime change in Syria and a warm war with Russia would be really good for the economy. Or, at least, it would be really good for that segment of the economy that financed her campaign. I know that and she knows that. The question is; do the American people know that. Do they know what they are voting for?

But what about Donald? Oh yeah, the Donald. You have to be kidding me? You really think they will let that clown become President? Well then, I have a bridge in Brooklyn I will sell you too. Do I have to spell it out for you? Did you watch the debates? He was so obviously “performing” the part of the bad guy it was ridiculous. Hillary and Donald are not competing against each other in a Presidential election. They are working together to sell you a product. The product they are selling is war and empire. Donald Trump is a metaphorical stand in for Putin. He is acting like an asshole on purpose. He is there to make the opposition to Empire look bad. And when Hillary wins the election in a landslide victory, they are going to use her victory as a mandate for a more aggressive war against Russia in Syria.

Is there any other rational explanation for the nonsense we are witnessing? Does the Empire really think they can “win” a war against Russia? Do they want to destroy the whole planet in a nuclear confrontation? Of course not. No doubt they think they can keep it under control. Smart power is the new catchphrase of the regime changers. The whole lot of them played way too much of the board game Risk as teenagers and it seriously damaged their psyches. Now they think they can roll the dice and win the whole planet. Russia and Vladimir are in their sites. With cyber war and financial war and propaganda war and perhaps some missiles and bombs in Syria, they think they can take out Russia. And this little media dance between the Hill and the Donald is an important part of their propaganda.

If I thought elections were real or legitimate I would vote for Jill Stein because her platform of ideas and policies is the most sensible. I don’t exactly agree with her on some things because she does not yet “see” or seem to understand organic economics but at least she is in the ballpark. I do wonder, however, why a nice lady like her wants to be CEO of the war machine.

Anyway, I say vote for whoever your favorite media outlet tells you to vote for. I don’t care if you choose the mysoginistic clown or the war mongering witch or even the neo-liberal pothead. I’m going to like you all the same. But please, when the election is over and HRC wins in a landslide and the hyped up media campaign segways into a full on drumbeat for war in Syria (a no fly zone) stand up and say no. That is the direction the train is heading. That is the product they are trying to sell us. War and Empire. They want to do to Damascus what they did to Sarajevo, Baghdad and Tripoli. If only there was a way to stop them.

Revolution 101

image

image

REVOLUTION 101.

Don’t get burned again.

Democratize the money supply. Until you do, all the elections in the world won’t make a damn bit of difference.

You are a data point in a marketing algorithm not a citizen participating in an election. Politicians work for their financial backers, not the voters. Voters are just the customers buying the crap the politicians are selling.

Remember Barack Obama, the peace candidate, who has now bombed 7 countries.  Remember George W. Bush, the “compassionate conservative,” that opposed “nation building” who then tried to “re-build Iraq” after he destroyed it. Remember Billy Clinton, the “liberal democrat”, who transformed social services into mass incarceration and let loose the vultures of finance capital onto the carcass of the US economic system. Remember the other Bush who wanted us to read his lips and Ronnie who opposed big government and gave us the largest government expansion ever.

So now Bernie is selling socialism that is not really socialism. In the spectacle of propaganda that is the US election performance, he is playing the extreme left character to counter balance the extreme right character of Donald Trump so that Hillary seems the rational, wise, compromise middle when they crown her queen. If Bernie ever did win, his economic plans would not get through Congress and socialism would take the blame for the next big crash. The important thing about Bernie is, he convinces a whole lot of people that they have a say in the process. Many of these people probably just about gave up after the travesty of Obama. But good ol’ Bernie has them believing again. What does he have them believing in? The empire? In the control of a wise and compassionate man, the power of the empire can be used for good…

I don’t believe in the empire. I oppose the empire. I believe in the decentralization of power structures and the localization of economies. The US empire should immediately withdraw its military and all of its fossil fuel consuming aggressively postured horrible weapons systems from their threatening positions around the world. And until they do, I’m certainly not going into a little booth to pull a lever and pretend that the people responsible for such madness represent me. I don’t care how good their healthcare plan is. That’s what I believe.

As such, I don’t vote in Presidential elections. This country and the world needs a political and economic revolution. Not another figure head sitting atop the same broken political/economic system. The revolution I’m talking about is conceptual and practical and non-violent. We have to replace a linear mechanical economic system with a dynamic organic one. A system that thrives on continuous war must be replaced by one that encourages peace. That may seem like a rather complicated maneuver but it is possible. It’s not going to happen at the voting booth though. The whole voting game is a distraction. But it can happen. All we have to do to make it happen is teach people the truth about how money functions and then democratize the money supply.

I’m serious, money is the tool the oligarchy uses to enslave us. The only way to free ourselves from their oppression is to change the way the money game is played.

What is money? We are taught to believe that money is a thing. Like a chunk of silver or gold that you possess and trade with others for what they possess. The more chunks you collect, the wealthier you are. But money is not a thing. Money is not real. Money is the symbolic representation of your legal right to use economic value within the jurisdiction of the government that issues the money. Understand. Money is your legal right to do stuff. Without money, you can’t do shit without getting arrested. You hear a lot of propaganda about government handouts and welfare queens and lazy people wanting free stuff. But the truth is, what you are talking about is the basic human right of all citizens to interact with their environment. What kind of a bizarre culture gets all excited and enthused about the right to own a gun but never ever talks about the RIGHT to food and shelter?

Next question; who controls the money supply? Is it democratic or oligarchic? When new money is added to the system, who gets it… where does it go? Do you personally have an open credit line with the Federal Reserve Bank? Of course not. In the last several years, the Federal Reserve has added over 4 trillion dollars to the economic system through a process called quantitative easing. Did you get quantitatively eased? Maybe. The money was used to add liquidity to the stock market and the market blew up like a balloon. If you have made money in the ever rising stock market in recent years, then you did effectively get quantitatively eased. Some people got eased more than others because that is the way the system is designed. It is called trickle down economics…. Capitalism…. Neoliberalism… A rose by any other name. The four trillion dollars was not distributed democratically among the citizens, it was given to large corporations and banks and hedge funds. They were supposed to pass it down through the markets to investors and employees and customers and citizens. And they did, sort of, a little bit.

The fundamentals of money supply are fairly easy to understand but rather difficult to apply. Every jurisdiction has an evolving amount of economic value available. Some value gets used up (food is eaten) and new value is added (food grows). The challenge of money supply is making sure the amount of currency in circulation corresponds to the amount of economic value available. If there is too much money in the system and not enough economic value you will have inflation. In other words, you will need more and more money to use comparatively less economic value. If there is not enough money in the system, the opposite happens. Economic value that is available gets wasted because no one can afford to use it. It is the job of the money supplier to find the perfect balance between the two situations. It is important to understand that money is a tool or mechanism that is used to manage underlying economic value. Money itself has very little real economic value (you can’t eat it but at least paper money will burn to keep you warm, the dots on the computer screen won’t even do that.)

How much is a loaf of bread? How much was a loaf of bread ten years ago? I can remember when a millionaire was considered incredibly wealthy. I have traveled in countries with a whole lot of zeroes on their money. When I was in Zimbabwe once, the exchange rate wasp 5000 to 1 when I arrived and 11,000 to 1 when I left two weeks later. After a while, the extra zeroes no longer mean anything. Chop them off the end or add them to the front. The money itself is not real. It is merely a symbol of your legal rights to use economic value. Since a human being cannot exist within modern society without using economic value, money is really a symbol of your legal right to exist.

Think about that for a while. And then think about all the different prongs of the empire that citizens have to crawl before in order to get enough currency to exist. Corporate slave wages, Unemployment, welfare, social security, disability…. Small Businesses have the same problem… they have to beg for grants or loans from their far away masters. Employees get the trickle down that their bosses had to beg for. Don’t you see. The problem is the money supply. When new money is added to the system, it is given to the wealthy. Politicians tend to argue a lot about the re-distribution of wealth. But what about the distribution of wealth in the first place? We presently have quite literally a trickle down money supply system. The revolution I’m talking about would replace that with a bubble up or bottom up money supply system.

Democratize the money supply. It’s that simple. The revolution is not complicated. It is a straightforward concept. A single demand. Democratize the money supply.

Intellectuals and pundits who theorize about such things sometimes refer to the concept of basic income. Another metaphor one hears from the propaganda box is the social safety net. But such metaphors tend to put the person who receives money into the role of loser or victim who must rely on charity rather than into the role of human who has a right to exist and interact with the environment where they live. In other words, we must replace the concept of welfare with the concept of investment.

Get rid of all the multi pronged social service bureaucracies and replace them with a money supply system that makes sense. All citizens receive the same package of economic rights through a monthly investment from the central bank or government. What is the fair market value of food, shelter, basic healthcare and education? In exchange for the monthly investment package, the citizens agree to pay in taxes 50% of everything they earn by participating in the free market back to the central bank or government. Every citizen gets the same deal. Dynamic economics. The monthly package of economic rights through an investment and the 50% tax on everything they earn. Many people will probably pay back more than they receive, some people will break even and some will probably just live off the monthly investment and not earn anything in the free market. But that is okay. In a world of over consumption, an economic system that does not punish people for choosing to live simply is a good thing. The important thing is that the money continually flows through the system; back and forth; dynamically. From central bank to citizens in monthly investments and from citizens back to the government in the form of taxes. It’s a contract; an agreement that all citizens agree to and all citizens benefit from.

So that’s it in a nut shell. The Revolution. Money or currency flows in a cycle that all citizens have access to instead of trickled downward to the lowly from the powers above.

The Empire will oppose it with the full force of propaganda and maybe even violence because the oligarchs who control the Empire understand the truth about bargaining position and the myth of a free market. The corporate business model is dependent upon a “slave” market… desperate people who will do what they are told because they desperately need money to survive. If citizens have economic rights they have bargaining position. They have the ability to not put up with bullshit from asshole bosses. Who is going to work at Walmart if they don’t have to? The US military is dependent on financial slaves as well. That’s why recruiters target poverty zones. A promising career in the military is a way to escape desperate poverty. If all citizens have economic rights, they wouldn’t be so eager to serve in Imperial wars. No doubt, brave volunteers would defend the homeland against invaders but that’s a whole different thing than going overseas to kill foreigners because it’s a good job or career. The US has not fought a defensive war in my lifetime. They are always on offense.

That’s because we have a linear mechanical economic system that requires continual growth to thrive. The clearest way to add economic value (growth) to a government’s jurisdiction is to take control or conquer the economic value of another jurisdiction. Does the economic system cause imperialism and continuous war or is it merely used as a cover story to explain human behavior? If we change the economic system and remove the underlying incentive for war can we stop lots of wars from happening. I don’t know. But it’s worth a shot.

In the natural world, energy (growth) and entropy (distribution) are always engaged in a dynamic balance. Life is what manifests in between them. The US economic system is fundamentally flawed on the entropy side. If we don’t fix it soon, the whole thing will go down in flames.

I believe in real free markets… not fake ones. A market can’t be free unless all the participants have basic economic rights. The right to interact with the environment and provide for your own needs is really the most essential human right. The government restricts that right by dividing the environment into “owned” pieces and enforcing laws that require payment of currency to owners for the use of the pieces. Accordingly, the government must provide enough currency to each citizen so that they can provide for their basic needs or the government violates the most essential human right and thereby renders itself illegitimate. I want to live in a world where empowered citizens seek and create work that inspires and interests them. I don’t want to live in a world where desperate people have to beg for jobs from corporate masters. In other words, I want a non-violent economic revolution. Would you like to join the cause?

The revolution is not copyrighted, please feel free to share it with anyone and everyone.

 

Not the Typical Indian Guru

Not the Typical Indian Guru

I never had a guru or spiritual leader or specific teacher whose message I follow.  Instead, many different humans have played that temporary role for me for brief periods of time.  This is the story of one of those people… and one of those brief periods of time.

I met Sunny at an outdoor café in Pushkar, India sometime around the turn of the century.  He was, perhaps, the wisest man I ever met.   I’m not sure if holy is the right word but he had that way about him… a sacred sort of presence.  I only knew him for about five days and I only talked with him at the café.  But we had several lengthy conversations over tchai and bhang lassis as we watched the crazy corner street traffic from our outdoor tables.  Truthfully, at the time, I didn’t put much importance on the conversations because I was distracted by a delightful little romance with a pretty young German woman.  But now, 15 years later, I’ve mostly forgotten the romance but I still think frequently about those conversations with Sunny.  I wonder why that is?

When I first saw him, it was kind of a mind twister.  I’d been traveling for several months around India but had only just arrived in Pushkar in the early morning.  As per my usual routine, I dropped my backpack in a cheap room and went looking for a centrally located café.  I found one on the corner of the main square and took a seat at an outdoor table.  That’s when I noticed two blonde haired backpacker guys sitting at the table across the aisle from me.  They were having a very animated discussion with an older local man.  The older man had long greasy grey hair, dark skin and shabby Indian clothes; he looked like he belonged in Pushkar.  He might even be a Sadhu except a real Sadhu would not be sitting in a café.   The strange thing was that the older guy answered the young guys back in their European language (Swedish, Dutch, or German?).  Not just a word or two, but full, complete and apparently complex sentences.  I remember even now how my brain was slightly confused by the situation because the language coming forth did not match the character speaking.

Later in the afternoon, on that same first day in Pushkar, I return to the centrally located café.  The house is packed this time and the server points me to the one empty seat.  I’ll be sharing a table with the strange older guy I saw in the morning.  He speaks to me in English.  It is one of the six languages he speaks.  He says his name is Sunny.

Continue reading

Change the Metaphor

This is another supplemental essay. A full story will be posted later in the week.

Change the Metaphor.

How do you change the controlling metaphor? That right there is the first and foremost challenge? Maybe it’s impossible. The metaphor is in the government, the metaphor is in the economic system, the metaphor is in the media and the metaphor is in the education system. The metaphor is so ingrained in our life that we hardly even know it’s there. What I mean by metaphor is the made up story that serves as the foundation for our day to day lives. The metaphor isn’t true but if you stop believing it a large part of what you do will be a complete waste of time.

It’s easy enough to change the metaphor for me. I simply don’t believe it. I have traveled a good part of the world and lived among people who believe different metaphors. Thus, it is easy for me to step back and look at my society’s metaphor critically. And when I do so, the metaphor seems kind or ridiculous. Most people who live here, however, believe the metaphor to be true without ever really thinking about it. Indeed, the mass media here is so powerful, that if I just watch it for a little while, I will start to believe the metaphor again. But no, not really, a quick trip to a nearby forest and I am back to reality. Continue reading